Pixel Crushers Forum

Digging up an old source with a new link since I went investigating localization options again. Their own method entails excel tables (and I also suspect that working in parallel with both writing and translating is "fun" as hell): http://www.nevigo.com/articy-importer/unity/html/howto_loc...

My googling around suggests that building a .asset file from within the player is probably not possible.

My reasonable alternative is to build a mini project which runs on a new .xml file and provides an asset bundle which could be then loaded at runtime.

As you may remember we wanted to change the database at runtime and got the excellent importing function. Now the database has grown considerably and the time to import the Articy XML is becoming an issue for writers on their laptops. It is a great benefit for them to change things without running U...

Greet. Now the writers have instant feedback again.

It seems that the following conversion prefs have issues with the IDs when importing at runtime: private static ConverterPrefs CreateImportSettings() { var prefs = new ConverterPrefs(); prefs.ProjectFilename = "C:\\furies.xml"; prefs.PortraitFolder = "Assets/Dialogue Databases/Resourc...

For some reason the conversion "Slots as ID" selection does not persist and we have to re-adjust it on every import. Could you add it to the persisting settings?

Since OnConversationEndLine runs after I click continue it is not useful for determining the suitable time when to show the button (to switch from "skip" to "continue"). Could we get OnSequenceStart() and OnSequenceEnd() on the DialogueManager gameObject? Currently we only get it...

Felt like opening christmas presents on Monday morning. Many thanks!

I actually came here to ask something similar. We took control of showing/hiding continue button since DS did not what we wanted and we probably do not still know what we eventually want. But we need a way to know when the sequence ends since we want to hide continue up to that point (or perhaps sho...

I don't think that we need both at the same time, since mapping it for one case should solve it for all the others quite easily.

Also, I can imagine that configuration for that kind of dual logic is tedious at best.